|
Patient Type
|
Primary Efficacy Outcome |
Safety Endpoints |
Duration of Treatment/NNS
|
Study Design |
|
STEMI 18,19 |
LOVENOX® vs. comparator 17% RRR in death or MI LOVENOX® vs. UFH (9.9% Vs. 12%) 95%
Cl; P<.001 N=20,479
|
LOVENOX® vs. comparator Major hemorrhage; 21% vs. 1.4% P<.001 ICH: .8% vs. .7% P=0.14
|
8 days or until hospital discharge; whichever came first NNT=48a
|
ExTRACT TIMI 25 was randomized, double-blind, double- dummy, parallel group, multi-national,
active- controlled, clinical trial Comparing LOVENOX® With UFH in acute STEMI patients
|
|
UA/NSTEMI 20 |
16% RRR in death, MI And recurrent angina LOVENOX® vs. UFH (16.6% vs. 19.8%) 95%
Cl; P=.019 N=3171
|
Overall hemorrhage: 18.4% vs. 14.2% P=.001 Major hemorrhage: 6.5% vs. 7% P=NS
|
48 hours to 8 days; median: 2.6 days NNT= 32a
|
ESSENCE was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel- group, multi-center,
multi-national trial comparing LOVENOX® and UFH in UA/STEMI patients
|
|
Acutely ill Medical Patients 11
|
63% RRR in DVT/PE events LOVENOX® vs. placebo (5.5% vs. 14.9%) 95% Cl; P<.001 N=579
|
Major hemorrhage: 1.7% vs. 1.1% P=NS Thrombocytopenia: 2.2% vs. 3.6% P=NS
|
In hospital treatment for 6-14 days median: 7 days NNT=11a
|
MEDONOX was a multi- center, multi-national, double-blind study of hospitalized
acutely ill medical patients Randomized to LOVENOX® or placebo
|
|
DVT Outpatient Treatment 16
|
1.4% ARR in recurrent symptomatic thromboembolism LOVENOX® vs. UFH (5.3% vs. 6.7%)
95% Cl; P=NS N=500
|
Major hemorrhage: 2.0% vs. 1.2% P=NS
|
Mean duration of LOVENOX®: 5.8 +- 1.8 days; UFH 5.5 +- 1.2 days
|
This study was randomized, open-label trial comparing LOVENOX® outpatient treatment
of DVT with inpatient IV UFH, each In conjunction with warfarin
|
|
Hip- Replacement Surgery 13
|
LOVENOX® vs. comparator 77% RRR in symptomatic DVT during hospitalization LOVENOX®
vs. warfarin (.3% vs. 1.1%) 95% Cl; P=.008 N=3011
|
LOVENOX® vs. comparator Major hemorrhage: .6% vs. .3% P=NS
|
Therapy initiated within 24 hours postoperatively; mean duration: 7.3 days NNT=125a
|
This study was randomized, open-label trial comparing LOVENOX® with warfarin in
patients undergoing ip-replacement surgery
|
|
Hip- Replacement Surgery (extended prophylaxis) 26
|
53% RRR in DVT/PE events LOVENOX vs. placebo (17.9% vs. 38.8%) 95% Cl; P<.001 N=233
|
Injection-site hematoma: 5.2% vs. 1.0% P=NS
|
In-hospital 7 to 11 days; outpatient 19- 23 days (average 21 days) NNT= 5a
|
A prospective, randomized, double- blind study conducted at a single center with
all patients receiving LOVENOX® during their hospitalization and blinded drug at
the end of hospitalization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knee- Replacement Surgery 14
|
44% RRR in total VTE documented by venography LOVENOX® vs. warfarin (25.4% vs. 45.5%)
95% Cl; P<.001 N=349
|
Major hemorrhage: 5.2% vs. 2.3% P=NS
|
Therapy initiated within 8 hours postoperatively and continued for 4 to 14 days
NNT=5a
|
This study was prospective, randomized, multicenter, open label parallel-group trial
comparing LOVENOX® with warfarin in patients undergoing knee-replacement surgery
|
|
Abdominal Surgery 15 |
3.5% ARR in DVT/PE incidence LOVENOX® vs. UFH (14.7% vs. 18.2%) 95% Cl; P=NS N=631
|
Overall hemorrhage: 18.7% vs. 17.1% P=NS Major hemorrhage: 4.1% vs. 2.9% P=NS
|
Therapy initiated 2 hours preoperatively and continued for 10 +- 2 days
|
ENOXACAN was a prospective, double- blind, randomized, multicenter trial comparing
LOVENOX® with UFH patients undergoing elective urative surgery for abdominal or
pelvic cancer
|